Which Of The Following Is A Barrier To Effective Therapy When The Cultural Backgrounds

Cultural psychology is the written report of how cultures reverberate and shape the psychological processes of their members.^[ane]

The master tenet of cultural psychology has been and, in most cases, still is that mind and culture are inseparable and mutually constitutive, pregnant that people are shaped past their culture and their culture is also shaped by them.^[two]

A common question asked is 'Does culture indeed act as some kind of agent?' It is the most pressing trouble in this field of research: is culture simply a label, sometimes an excuse, so merely a metaphor? Or does it really 'do' something, influencing people's beliefs for example? Gerd Baumann has argued: "Civilization is not a real thing, but an abstract and purely analytical notion. In itself «it» does not «cause» beliefs, just denotes an brainchild from information technology, and is thus neither normative nor predictive just a heuristic means towards explaining how people sympathize and act upon the globe."^[3] More than on this issue in section 9.

As Richard Shweder, one of the major proponents of the field, writes, "Cultural psychology is the written report of the style cultural traditions and social practices regulate, limited, and transform the human psyche, resulting less in psychic unity for humankind than in indigenous divergences in mind, self, and emotion."^[iv]

Relationships with other branches of psychology [edit]

Cultural psychology is often confused with cross-cultural psychology. However, cultural psychology is distinct from cantankerous-cultural psychology in that the cross-cultural psychologists by and large use culture as a means of testing the universality of psychological processes rather than determining how local cultural practices shape psychological processes.^[v] So whereas a cantankerous-cultural psychologist might enquire whether Jean Piaget's stages of evolution are universal across a variety of cultures, a cultural psychologist would be interested in how the social practices of a detail set up of cultures shape the development of cognitive processes in dissimilar ways.^{[half dozen]}

Cultural psychology enquiry informs several fields within psychology, including social psychology, cultural-historical psychology, developmental psychology, and cognitive psychology. Nevertheless, the constructivist perspective of cultural psychology, through which cultural psychologists study idea patterns and behaviors inside and across cultures, tends to clash with the universal perspectives common in nearly fields in psychology, which seek to qualify fundamental psychological truths that are consequent across all of humanity.

Importance [edit]

Demand for expanded cultural research [edit]

According to Richard Shweder, there has been repeated failure to replicate Western psychology laboratory findings in not-Western settings.^[4] Therefore, a major goal of cultural psychology is to accept many and varied cultures contribute to basic psychological theories in order to correct these theories and then that they become more relevant to the predictions, descriptions, and explanations of all human behaviors, not but Western ones.^[vii] This goal is shared by many of the scholars who promote the ethnic psychology arroyo. In an try to bear witness the interrelated interests of cultural and ethnic psychology, cultural psychologist Pradeep Chakkarath emphasizes that international mainstream psychology, every bit it has been exported to most regions of the earth by the so-called West, is but one among many indigenous psychologies and therefore may not have enough intercultural expertise to claim, every bit it oft does, that its theories have universal validity.^[8] Accordingly, cultural groups have diverse ways of defining emotional problems, as well as distinguishing betwixt physical and mental distress. For case, Arthur Kleinman has shown how the notion of depression in Chinese culture has been associated with physiological problems, before condign acknowledged more recently as an emotional concern.^[ix] Furthermore, the type of therapy people pursue is influenced by cultural conceptions of privacy and shame, equally well equally the stigmas associated with specific issues.^[ten]

The acronym W.E.I.R.D. describes populations that are Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic. Thus far, W.Due east.I.R.D. populations have been vastly overrepresented in psychological research.^[11] ^[12] In an assay of elevation journals in the psychology discipline, it was found that 96% of subjects who participated in those studies came from Western Industrialized countries, with 68% of them coming from the The states. This is largely due to the fact that 99% of the authors of these journals were at Western Universities with 73% of them at American Universities. With this information, it is concluded that 96% of psychological findings come up from Westward.Due east.I.R.D. countries.^[12] Findings from psychology research utilizing primarily West.East.I.R.D. populations are often labeled as universal theories and are inaccurately applied to other cultures.^[xiii]

Recent research is showing that cultures differ in many areas, such as logical reasoning and social values.^[12] ^[13] The evidence that basic cerebral and motivational processes vary beyond populations has become increasingly hard to ignore. For example, many studies have shown that Americans, Canadians and western Europeans rely on analytical reasoning strategies, which separate objects from their contexts to explicate and predict behavior. Social psychologists refer to the "fundamental attribution mistake" or the tendency to explain people's beliefs in terms of internal, inherent personality traits rather than external, situational considerations (due east.k. attributing an example of aroused beliefs to an aroused personality). Outside Due west.Due east.I.R.D. cultures, however, this phenomenon is less prominent, as many non-West.E.I.R.D. populations tend to pay more attention to the context in which behavior occurs. Asians tend to reason holistically, for example past considering people'due south behavior in terms of their state of affairs; someone's anger might be viewed equally just a upshot of an irritating day.^[14] ^[15] Yet many long-standing theories of how humans recollect rely on the prominence of analytical idea.^[xiii]

By studying only W.Due east.I.R.D. populations, psychologists fail to business relationship for a substantial amount of diverseness of the global population every bit W.E.I.R.D. countries only represent 12% of the earth's population.^[12] Applying the findings from W.E.I.R.D. populations to other populations can pb to a miscalculation of psychological theories and may hinder psychologists' abilities to isolate fundamental cultural characteristics.

Mutual constitution [edit]

Mutual constitution is the notion that the society and the individual take an influencing effect on 1 another. Because a society is composed of individuals, the behavior and actions of the individuals directly impact the society. In the aforementioned manner, society directly impacts the private living inside it. The values, morals, and ways of life a society exemplifies volition have an firsthand impact on the way an individual is shaped as a person. The atmosphere that a order provides for the individual is a determining factor for how an individual will develop. Furthermore, mutual constitution is a cyclical model in which the society and the individual both influence one some other.^[16]

While cultural psychology is reliant on this model, societies often fail to recognize this. Despite the overwhelming acceptance that people affect civilization and culture affects people, societal systems tend to minimize the effect that people form on their communities. For example, mission statements of businesses, schools, and foundations attempt to make promises regarding the environs and values that their establishment holds. However, these promises cannot exist made in accordance with the mutually consisting theory without existence upheld past all participants. The mission statement for the employees of Southwest Airlines, for instance, makes the claim that, "...We are committed to provide our Employees a stable work surroundings with equal opportunity for learning and personal growth".^[17] While the company can ensure the "equal opportunity for learning and personal growth", the aforementioned bulletin cannot be promised. The piece of work environment that Southwest provides includes paying consumers. While rules can be enforced to ensure safety on their aircraft, customers volition not exist removed due to attitude or a lack of courtesy. This therefore contradicts the promise of a "stable work environs". On the contrary, some establishments practice ensure that their mission statements concord with the mutually consisting model. For example, Yale University promises within its mission statement that:

Yale is committed to improving the world today and for future generations through outstanding research and scholarship, education, preservation, and practice. Yale educates aspiring leaders worldwide who serve all sectors of society. We bear out this mission through the free exchange of ideas in an ethical, interdependent, and diverse community of faculty, staff, students, and alumni.^[18]

This image is a representation derived from ideas found in the periodical article "Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Common Constitution" by Hazel Rose Markus and Shinoba Kitayama.

Instead of making promises that depend on all of their students and faculty, they make statements that can refer to only a part of their student/ faculty torso. The statement focuses more than on what they offer, and how they uphold these promises. By providing evidence they provide readers with an example as to how their school customs members participate in the environment they hope, accepting the community's role in their school culture.

Past research has been conducted by middle-class North Americans analyzing culturally different societies by means of comparison mostly involving middle-course North Americans and/or aforementioned W.E.I.R.D. societies. What has been characterized as Euro-American centrism, resulted in a great book of research for this specific pick of humans. It has as well allowed us to divert from the idea that certain psychological processes can be considered basic or universal, and recognize humans' remarkable capacity to create cultures and then exist shaped by them.^[xix] Although cultural psychology has internalized the mutually constituting model, further implementation in our club is necessary. Being aware of this model promotes taking responsibility for ane's actions and the effect that their deportment accept on their community. Through acceptance of ones responsibilities and conscious application, communities have opportunity for improvement which in turn supports the individuals inside the community. These ideas can be found in the journal article "Cultures and Selves: A Bicycle of Common Constitution" by Hazel Rose Markus and Shinobu Kitayama which are also represented in the graphic provided.

Criticisms [edit]

Stereotyping [edit]

I of the nigh significant themes in recent years has been cultural differences between Eastward Asians and North Americans in attention,^[xx] perception,^[21] cognition,^[22] and social psychological phenomena such as the self.^[23] Some psychologists, such as Turiel, have argued that this research is based on cultural stereotyping.^[24] Psychologist Per Gjerde states that cultural psychology tends to "generalize almost man evolution across nations and continents" and assigning characteristics to a culture promotes a disregard for heterogeneity and minimizes the role of the private.^[25] Gjerde argues that individuals develop multiple perspectives almost their civilisation, sometimes human activity in accordance with their civilisation without sharing the cultural behavior, and sometimes outright oppose their culture. Stereotyping thus views individuals as homogeneous products of culture.^[26]

Faulty methodology [edit]

Self-reporting data is one of the easiest and about attainable methods of mass data collection, particularly in cultural psychology.^[twenty] ^[27] Nevertheless, overemphasizing cross-cultural comparisons of self-reported attitudes and values can pb to relatively unstable and ultimately misleading data.^[28] ^[29]

Methods [edit]

Cultural psychologist, Richard Shweder argues that the psyche and culture are mutually constructed and inseparable.^[iv] The failure of replicating many psychology findings in other regions of the world supported the idea that mind and environs are interdependent, and different throughout the world. Some criticisms state that using self-report may exist a relatively unreliable method, and could be misleading specially in different cultural context. Regardless that self-study is an important way to obtain mass information, it is not the only way.

In fact, cultural psychologists utilized multiple measurements and resources no dissimilar from other scientific researches – ascertainment, experiment, data analysis etc. For example, Nisbett & Cohen (1996) investigated the relation betwixt historical cultural groundwork and regional assailment divergence in the The statesA. In this study, researchers designed laboratory experiment to observe participants' aggression, and criminal offence charge per unit, demographic statistics were analyzed. The experiment results supported the civilisation of honor theory that the assailment is a defense machinery which is rooted in the herding cultural origin for almost of the southerners.^[23] In laboratory observations, Heine and his colleagues found that Japanese students spend more than fourth dimension than American students on tasks that they did poorly on, and the finding presents a cocky-improvement motivation often seen in Eastward Asian that failure and success is interconvertible with attempt.^[30] In terms of cognition styles, Chinese tend to perceive image using a holistic view compared to American.^[31]

Quantitative statistics of cultural products revealed that public media in western countries promote more individualistic components than East-Asian countries.^[32] These statistics are objective because information technology does non involve having people fill out questionnaire, instead, psychologists employ physical measurements to quantitatively collect data about culture products, such equally painting and photos. These statistics data can besides be national records, for instance, Chiao & Blizinsky (2010) revealed that cultures of loftier collectivism is associated with lower prevalence of mood/anxiety disorders in study involving 29 countries.^[33] In improver to the experimental and statistics information, testify from neuro-imaging studies, also assistance strengthen the reliability of cultural psychology research. For example, when thinking of mother, the encephalon region related to self-concept showed significant activation in Chinese, whereas no activation observed in Westerners.^[34]

Cultural models [edit]

"Ane way we organize and understand our social globe is through the use of cultural models or culturally shaped mental maps. These consist of culturally derived ideas and practices that are embodied, enacted, or instituted in everyday life." Cultural psychologists develop models to categorize cultural phenomena.^[35]

The iv I's civilization cycle [edit]

The 4 I's cultural model was adult past Hazel Rose Markus and Alana Conner in their book Clash! 8 Cultural Conflicts That Make Us Who Nosotros Are. In it, they refer to the mutually constitutive nature of culture and individual as a "civilisation cycle." The civilisation cycle consists of 4 layers (Individuals, Interactions, Institutions, Ideas) of cultural influence that help to explain the interaction betwixt cocky and culture.^[36]

Individuals [edit]

The get-go "I" concerns how an individual thinks nearly and expresses itself. Studies prove that in the Usa, individuals are more probable recall of him or herself as "contained", "equal", and "individualistic". Individuals accept characteristics that are consistent across time and situation. When asked to describe themselves, Americans are likely to apply adjectives to draw their personalities, such equally "energetic", "friendly", or "hard-working". In Japan, studies show that individuals are more likely to call up of themselves as "obligated to society", "interdependent", and "considerate". The self is adaptable to the situation. Japanese individuals are therefore more probable to describe themselves in relation to others, such as "I try non to upset anyone," or "I am a father, a son, and a brother."^[37]

Interactions [edit]

Interactions with other people and products reinforce cultural behaviors on a daily footing. Stories, songs, architecture, and advertisements are all methods of interaction that guide individuals in a civilization to promote certain values and teach them how to behave.^[27] For case, in Japan, no-smoking signs emphasize the impact that smoke has on others past illustrating the path of smoke as it affects surrounding people. In the Us, no-smoking signs focus on individual activity by simply saying "No Smoking". These signs reflect underlying cultural norms and values, and when people encounter them they are encouraged to behave in accordance with the greater cultural values.

Institutions [edit]

The adjacent layer of culture is made up of the institutions in which everyday interactions have place. These determine and enforce the rules for a society and include legal, regime, economic, scientific, philosophical, and religious bodies. Institutions encourage sure practices and products while discouraging others. In Japanese kindergartens, children acquire near important cultural values such equally teamwork, group harmony, and cooperation. During "altogether calendar month commemoration," for example, the class celebrates all the children who have birthdays that month. This institutional practice underscores the importance of a group over an private. In United states kindergartens, children learn their personal value when they celebrate their birthdays one by 1, enforcing the cultural value of uniqueness and individualism. Everyday institutional practices such equally classroom birthday celebrations propagate prominent cultural themes.^[27] ^[37]

Ideas

The concluding cycle, which houses the highest and most abstract thought level of the wheel, focuses on the big ideas that each civilization has which answers the large questions of life, such every bit Why are we hither, where did nosotros come up from, and where are we going. The civilization around the ideas is what gives structure to the answers and allows for a greater understanding of what is believed. In their book Hazel and Alana say, "In charting the course of your self, your postal code is but equally of import every bit your genetic code".^[36] The culture of the idea is merely as important as the idea itself.

Whiting model [edit]

John and Beatrice Whiting, along with their enquiry students at Harvard University, developed the "Whiting model" for child development during the 1970s and 1980s, which specifically focused on how civilization influences development.^[38]

The Whitings coined the term "cultural learning environment", to describe the surroundings that influence a kid during development.^[39] Beatrice Whiting divers a child's environmental contexts every bit being "characterized past an activeness in progress, a physically defined space, a characteristic group of people, and norms of behavior".^[39] This surround is equanimous of several layers. A child's geographical context influences the history/anthropology of their greater community. This results in maintenance systems (i.e., sociological characteristics) that form a cultural learning environment. These factors inform learned behavior, or progressive expressive systems that take the form of religion, magic beliefs, ritual and ceremony, art, recreation, games and play, or criminal offense rates.^[40]

Many researchers have expanded upon the Whiting model,^[38] and the Whiting model'south influence is articulate in both modern psychology and anthropology. According to an article past Thomas Weisner in the Periodical of Cross-Cultural Psychology, "All these [more contempo] approaches share a common intellectual projection: to take culture and context deeply and seriously into account in studies of human being development."^[41]

Culture and motivation [edit]

Cocky-enhancement vs. self-comeback [edit]

While self-enhancement is a person'south motivation to view themselves positively, self-comeback is a person's motivation to accept others view themselves positively. The stardom between the two modes of life is almost evident between independent and collectivistic cultures.^[42] Cultures with independent self-views (the premise that people run into themselves as self-contained entities) often emphasize self-esteem, confidence in i's ain worth and abilities.^[43] With self-esteem seen as a main source of happiness in Western cultures,^[44] the motivation to self-heighten generally follows as a fashion to maintain one's positive view about oneself. Some strategies employed when self-enhancing often include downward social comparison, compensatory self-enhancement, discounting, external attributions and basking in reflected glory.^[45] In contrast, collectivistic cultures oftentimes emphasize self-comeback as a leading motivating factor in their lives. This motivation is oftentimes derived from a desire to not lose confront and to appear positively among social groups.^[46]

Culture and empathy [edit]

Cultural orientation: collectivistic and individualistic [edit]

A master distinction to understand when looking at psychology and culture is the departure betwixt individualistic and collectivistic cultures. People from an individualistic culture typically demonstrate an independent view of the self; the focus is usually on personal accomplishment.^[47] Members of a collectivistic gild have more of a focus on the group (interdependent view of self), usually focusing on things that volition benefit the grouping.^[48] Research has shown such differences of the self when comparing collectivistic and individualistic cultures: The Primal Attribution Error has been shown to exist more mutual in America (individualistic) as compared to in India (collectivistic).^[49] Along these same lines, the self-serving bias was again shown as more common among Americans than Japanese individuals.^[fifty] This can be seen in a study involving an blitheness of fish, wherein Western viewers interpreted the scene of a fish swimming away from a schoolhouse equally an expression of individualism and independence, while Eastern individuals wondered what was wrong with the singular fish and concluded that the school had kicked information technology out.^[51] Another written report showed that in coverage of the same instance of violent crime, Western news focused on innate graphic symbol flaws and the failings of the private while Chinese news pointed out the lack of relationships of the perpetrator in a foreign surroundings and the failings of society.^[51] This is non to imply that collectivism and individualism are completely dichotomous, just these 2 cultural orientations are to be understood more than so as a spectrum. Each representation is at either end; thus, some members of individualistic cultures may concord collectivistic values, and some collectivistic individual may hold some individualist values. The concepts of collectivism and individualism bear witness a general thought of the values of a specific ethnic civilization only should not be juxtaposed in competition.^[52]

Empathy across cultures [edit]

These differences in values across cultures suggests that understanding and expressing empathy may be manifested differently throughout varying cultures. Duan and Colina^[53] first discussed empathy in subcategories of intellectual empathy: taking on someone's thoughts/perspective, too known as cognitive empathy^[54] and emotional empathy: taking on someone's feeling/experience. Duan, Wei, and Wang^[55] furthered this idea to include empathy in terms of being either dispositional (capacity for noticing/understanding empathy) or experiential (specific to a sure context or situation, observing the person and empathizing). This created four types of empathy to further examine: 1) dispositional intellectual empathy; 2) dispositional empathic emotion; 3) experienced intellectual empathy; and 4) experienced empathic emotion. These 4 branches allowed researchers to examine empathic proclivities amongst individuals of different cultures. While individualism was non shown to correlate with either types of dispositional empathy, collectivism was shown to have a direct correlation with both types of dispositional empathy, perhaps suggesting that by having less focus on the cocky, at that place is more capacity towards noticing the needs of others. More than so, individualism predicted experienced intellectual empathy, and collectivism predicted experienced empathic emotion. These results are congruent with the values of collectivistic and individualistic societies. The cocky-centered identity and egoistic motives prevalent in individualistic cultures, perhaps acts equally a hindrance in being open up to (fully) experiencing empathy.^[56]

Intercultural and ethnocultural empathy [edit]

Cultural empathy became broadly understood as concurrent understanding and acceptance of a civilisation unlike from one'southward own.^[57] This thought has been further developed with the concept of ethnocultural empathy.^[58] This moves beyond simply accepting and agreement some other culture, and as well includes acknowledging how the values of a culture may affect empathy. This idea is meant to foster cultural empathy also as engender cultural competence.^[58] ^[59] One of the greatest barriers of empathy between cultures is people'south tendency to operate from an ethnocentric indicate of view. Eysenck^[60] conceptualized ethnocentrism every bit using one's own culture to sympathise the remainder of the world, while holding 1'south ain values equally correct. Concomitant with this barrier to intercultural empathy, Rasoal, Eklund, and Hansen^[61] posit five hindrances of intercultural empathy; these include:

Paucity of:

(general) cognition outside 1's own culture
(general) experience with other cultures exterior one's own
(specific) cognition regarding other people'due south cultures
(specific) experiences regarding other people's cultures

and:

disability to bridge different cultures past understanding the commonalities and dissimilarities

These five points elucidate lack of both depth and breadth as hindrances in developing and practicing intercultural empathy.

Another barrier to intercultural empathy is that there is ofttimes a power dynamic between different cultures. Bridging an oppressed culture with their (upper-echelon) oppressor is a goal of intercultural empathy. One approach to this bulwark is to attempt to admit ane's personal oppression.^[62] While this may be minimal in comparison to other people's oppression, information technology volition however assistance with realizing that other people accept been oppressed.^[62] The goal of bridging the gap should focus on building an alliance by finding the core commonalities of the man experience; this shows empathy to exist a relational experience, not an independent 1. Through this, the goal is that intercultural empathy can lend toward broader intercultural understanding across cultures and societies.

Four important facets of cultural empathy are:^[58]

Taking the perspective of someone from a unlike culture
Understanding the verbal/behavioral expression that occurs during ethnocultural empathy
Being cognizant of how different cultures are treated past larger entities such as the task market and the media
Accepting differences in cultural choices regarding language, clothing preference, food option, etc.

These four aspects may be especially helpful for practicing cultural competence in a clinical setting. Given that most psychological practices were founded on the parochial ideals of Euro-American psychologists, cultural competence was not considered much of a necessity until said psychologists increasingly began seeing clients with different ethnic backgrounds.^[59] Many of the problems that contribute to therapy not existence benign for people of color include: therapy having an individual focus, an emphasis on expressiveness, and an emphasis on openness.^[63] For more than on intercultural competence, run across intercultural competence.

The Nijmegen schoolhouse of cultural psychology [edit]

Already in 1956 the department of cultural psychology and psychology of religion was founded at the Radboud University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.^[64] Ane of its aims was to study culture and organized religion as psychological phenomena. In 1986 the department was split in a section Psychology of Religion and a section Cultural Psychology. The research aim of the latter was to study culture as a beliefs regulating system, which in fact implied that civilisation was no longer seen as an explanatory concept, but equally something to exist explained. Instead of viewing culture equally a domain in its own right, every bit something separate from individual human being beings, culture was seen as the production of human being interaction leading to patterned beliefs characteristic of human groups. Information technology looks then cocky-evident, but this shift has wide-reaching implications. The expression: "culture of...." - and one tin fill in whatsoever nation or group - tin can no longer exist used to explain behaviors. One has to await for other determinants of beliefs than the ones associated with 'culture'. Expressions like: 'information technology is our civilisation to put women in a dependent position and men above them' tin can no longer be used. Such a manner of reasoning obscures the real determinants of the behavioral patterning that causes this sex and gender related land of affairs. The main publication in the department in which this view is elaborated is the book Culture as Embodiment. The social tuning of behavior, written by Paul Voestermans & Theo Verheggen. Oxford, Blackwell, 2014. In this book a tool kit is presented, which tin can be helpful in replacing the thought of culture equally an explanatory variable with concepts and inquiry instruments by means of which the behavioral patterning tin can be understood much improve.

In 2020 an empirical program was launched by Ernst Graamans in his book Across the Idea of Culture: Understanding and Changing Cultural Practices in Business and Life Matters https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/beyond-the-idea-of-culture-understanding-and-irresolute-cultural-pr. This dissertation at the Amsterdam Costless University Business School of Economics explores then called 'cultural modify' and related practices in business boardrooms, institutions of care, merely also in the community of female person sexual mutilation in African communities. The defense force of these practices in terms of: "information technology is our culture" is cogently criticised. In cases of communal female circumcision practices this empirical program makes the replacement of these practices by alternative rituals more than viable.

Research institutions [edit]

Institute of Cultural Psychology and Qualitative Social Inquiry (ikus)
Institute of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University Vienna
Laboratory of Comparative Man Cognition (LCHC)
Civilisation and Cognition, Academy of Michigan
Centre for Cultural Psychology, Aalborg University
Hans Kilian and Lotte Köhler Center for Cultural Psychology and Historical Anthropology (KKC)
Culture and Cocky Lab, University of British Columbia

Come across likewise [edit]

Indian psychology

References [edit]

^ Heine, South. J. (2011). Cultural Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton & Visitor.
^ Fiske, A.; Kitayama, S.; Markus, H.R.; & Nisbett, R.Due east. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. Gilbert & S. Fiske & Thousand. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., pp. 915–81). San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.
^ Baumann, Gerd (1997). Dominant and demiotic discourses of culture. Their Relevance to Multi-Indigenous Alliances. In: P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity. Multicultural Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism. London & New Jersey: Zed Books.
^ ^a ^b ^c Shweder, Richard (1991). Thinking Through Cultures. Harvard Academy Press. ISBN 0-674-88415-nine.
^ Heine, S.; Ruby, M. B. (2010). "Cultural Psychology". Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 1 (2): 254–266. doi:x.1002/wcs.seven. PMID 26271239.
^ Markus, H.R.; Kitayama, South. (2003). "Culture, Self, and the Reality of the Social". Psychological Research. 14 (3): 277–83. doi:x.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_17.
^ Shweder, R.A. & Levine, R.A., eds. (1984). Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
^ Chakkarath, P. (2012). "The role of indigenous psychologies in the building of basic cultural psychology". In J. Valsiner (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 71–95. doi:x.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.001.0001. ISBN9780195396430.
^ Kleinman, Arthur (1982). "Neurasthenia and depression: A study of somatization and culture in Communist china". Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. half dozen (2): 117–190. doi:10.1007/BF00051427. PMID 7116909. S2CID 23591895.
^ Hizi, Gil (2016). "Evading chronicity: Paradoxes in counseling psychology in contemporary Red china". Asian Anthropology. 15: 68–81. doi:x.1080/1683478X.2016.1164353. S2CID 147094764.
^ Arnett, J. J. (2008). "The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American" (PDF). American Psychologist. 63 (7): 602–614. CiteSeerXten.one.one.455.5296. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602. PMID 18855491. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-08. Retrieved 2013-09-28 .
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Henrich, J.; Heine, Due south. J.; Norenzayan, A. (2010). "The weirdest people in the world?" (PDF). Behavioral and Encephalon Sciences. 33 (ii–three): 61–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-26A1-half-dozen. PMID 20550733. S2CID 220918842.
^ ^a ^b ^c Henrich, Joseph (2010). "Almost people are not WEIRD". Nature. 466 (5): 29. Bibcode:2010Natur.466...29H. doi:10.1038/466029a. PMID 20595995.
^ Jones, D. (2010). "A WEIRD View of Human being Nature" (PDF). Science. 328 (25): 1627. doi:x.1126/science.328.5986.1627. PMID 20576866.
^ Nisbett, R.; Miyamoto, Y. (2005). "The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception". Trends in Cerebral Sciences. nine (10): 467–473. CiteSeerX10.1.1.87.43. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004. PMID 16129648. S2CID 231366.
^ Rogoff, Barbara (2003). The Cultural Nature of Homo Development (Reprint ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-513133-8.
^ "Near Southwest". Southwest Airlines.
^ "Mission Argument". Yale University. 2015-09-03.
^ Markus, Hazel Rose; Kitayama, Shinobu (2010). "Cultures and Selves: A Bike of Mutual Constitution". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 5 (4): 420–430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557. PMID 26162188. S2CID 7533754.
^ ^a ^b Masuda, T.; Nisbett, R.A. (2001). "Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 81 (five): 922–34. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.922. PMID 11708567. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-24.
^ Kitayama, South.; Duffy, Due south.; Kawamura, T.; Larsen, J.T. (2003). "Perceiving an object and its context in dissimilar cultures: A cultural await at new expect" (PDF). Psychological Science. 14 (3): 201–06. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02432. PMID 12741741. S2CID 13528749. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-24. Retrieved 2013-09-29 .
^ Cole, M. (1998). Cultural Psychology: A In one case and Future Subject area. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
^ ^a ^b Nisbett, R.E.; & Cohen, D. (1996). Civilisation of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Denver, CO: Westview Press.
^ Turiel, Elliott (2002). The Civilisation of Morality: Social Development, Context, and Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
^ McNulty, Jennifer (2004, July 26). "Emphasis on 'culture' in psychology fuels stereotypes, scholar says." Academy of California: Santa Cruz.
^ Wainryb, C (2004). "The Study of Diversity in Homo Development: Culture, Urgencies, and Perils" (PDF). Human being Development. 47 (iii): 131–137. doi:x.1159/000077986. S2CID 143136441. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-11-10.
^ ^a ^b ^c Kitayama, S.; et al. (2002). "Culture and basic psychological processes—Toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al" (PDF). Psychological Bulletin. 128 (one): 89–96. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89. PMID 11843550.
^ Heine, S.J.; Lehman, D.R.; Peng, One thousand.; Greenholtz, J. (2002). "What'southward wrong with cantankerous-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales: The reference-group problem" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 82 (6): 903–18. doi:ten.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903. PMID 12051579.
^ Peng, K.; Nisbett, R.Due east.; Wong, North. (1997). "Validity bug of cross-cultural value comparison and possible solutions" (PDF). Psychological Methods. 2 (4): 329–41. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.329.
^ Heine, Steven (2012). Cultural psychology. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. pp. 253–254. ISBN978-0-393-91283-eight.
^ Jenkins, Lucas J.; Yang, Yung-Jui; Goh, Joshua; Hong, Ying-Yi; Park, Denise C. (2010-06-01). "Cultural differences in the lateral occipital circuitous while viewing incongruent scenes". Social Cognitive and Melancholia Neuroscience. five (two–iii): 236–241. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp056. ISSN 1749-5016. PMC2894688. PMID 20083532.
^ Morling, Beth; Lamoreaux, Marika (2008-08-01). "Measuring Culture Outside the Head: A Meta-Assay of Individualism—Collectivism in Cultural Products". Personality and Social Psychology Review. 12 (3): 199–221. doi:10.1177/1088868308318260. ISSN 1088-8683. PMID 18544712. S2CID 6673527.
^ Chiao, Joan Y.; Blizinsky, Katherine D. (2010-02-22). "Culture–factor coevolution of individualism–collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 277 (1681): 529–537. doi:x.1098/rspb.2009.1650. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC2842692. PMID 19864286.
^ Zhu, Ying; Zhang, Li; Fan, Jin; Han, Shihui (2007-02-01). "Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation". NeuroImage. 34 (3): 1310–1316. CiteSeerX10.1.1.125.9234. doi:x.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047. PMID 17134915. S2CID 11613104.
^ Fryberg, S.A.; Markus, H.R. (2007). "Cultural models of education in American Indian, Asian America, and European American contexts". Social Psychology of Education. x (two): 1381–2890. doi:10.1007/s11218-007-9017-z. S2CID 143689413.
^ ^a ^b Markus, H. R., & Conner, A. C. (2013). Clash! Eight Cultural Conflicts that Make U.s.a. Who We Are. New York: Penguin (Hudson Street Press).
^ ^a ^b Heine, Southward. (2011). Cultural Psychology. San Francisco: W. W. Norton & Co.
^ ^a ^b Worthman, C. M. (2010). "The Ecology of Human being Evolution: Evolving Models for Cultural Psychology". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 41 (4): 546–562. doi:10.1177/0022022110362627. S2CID 4942595.
^ ^a ^b Edwards, Carolyn P. and Bloch, 1000. (2010). "The Whitings' Concepts of Civilisation and How They Have Fared in Contemporary Psychology and Anthropology." Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology.Paper 501.
^ John W. Drupe, Ype H. Poortinga, Marshall H. Segall, Pierre R. Dasen, Cambridge University Press, 1992, Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications: Second Edition
^ Weisner, T.S. (2010). "John and Beatrice Whiting's Contributions to the Cantankerous-Cultural Study of Human Development: Their Values, Goals, Norms, and Practices". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 41 (iv): 499–509. doi:10.1177/0022022110362720. S2CID 145703685.
^ Heine, Steven (1999). "Is there a universal need for positive cocky-regard?". 2017 American Psychological Association.
^ "Loftier cocky-esteem may exist culturally universal, international study shows".
^ Kim, Hyunji (Feb 2016). "The Role of Positive Cocky-Evaluation on Cantankerous-Cultural Differences in Well-Being". Cross-Cultural Research. 50: 85–99. doi:x.1177/1069397115617902. S2CID 146919675.
^ Heine, Steven. Cultural Psychology.
^ Heine, Steven J.; Raineri, Andres (Jan 2009). "Self-Improving Motivations and Collectivism". Periodical of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 40 (1): 158–163. doi:10.1177/0022022108326193. S2CID 35773418.
^ Prooijen, J. (2013). "Individualistic and social motives for justice judgments". Register of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1299 (ane): 60–67. Bibcode:2013NYASA1299...60V. doi:10.1111/nyas.12143. PMID 25708080. S2CID 196583933.
^ Hui, C.H. (1988). "Measurement of individualism-collectivism". Journal of Research in Personality. 22 (1): 17–36. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(88)90022-0.
^ Ross (1977). "The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process". In Berkowitz, Fifty. (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: Bookish Printing.
^ Kashima, Y.; Triandis, H.C. (1986). "The self-serving bias in attributions as a coping strategy: A cantankerous-cultural study". Periodical of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 17 (ane): 83–97. doi:10.1177/0022002186017001006. S2CID 145222207.
^ ^a ^b Zimbardo, Philip. "Discovering Psychology: Cultural Psychology" (PDF). Learner.org . Retrieved 26 Jan 2018.
^ Hofstede, Thousand. (1980). Civilisation'south consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
^ Duan, C.; Loma, C.E. (1996). "The current country of empathy research". Periodical of Counseling Psychology. 43 (3): 261–74. doi:x.1037/0022-0167.43.3.261.
^ Soto, J.A.; Levenson, R.W. (2009). "Emotion recognition across culture: The influence of ethnicity on empathic accuracy and physiological linkage". Emotion. 9 (6): 874–884. doi:x.1037/a0017399. PMC2877627. PMID 20001130.
^ Duan, C.; Wei, Chiliad.; Wang, 50. (2008). "The role of individualism-collectivism". Asian Periodical of Counseling. 29 (3): 57–81.
^ Kitayama, Due south.; Markus, H.R. (1994). Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
^ Ridely, C.R.; Lingle, D.Due west. (1996). "Cultural empathy in multicultural counseling: A multidimensional procedure model.". In Pedersen, P.B.; Draguns, J.G. (eds.). Counseling Beyond Civilisation. Thousands Oaks: CA: Sage.
^ ^a ^b ^c Wang, Y.W.; Blier, J.; Davidson, M.; Savoy, H.; Tan, J.; Tan, J.; Yakushka, O. (2003). "The scale of ethnocultural empathy: Development, validation, and reliability". Journal of Counseling Psychology. l (2): 221–234. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.221.
^ ^a ^b Dyche, 50.; Zayas, L.H. (2001). "Cantankerous-cultural empathy and training the contemporary psychotherapist". Clinical Social Piece of work Journal. 29 (iii): 245–258. doi:x.1023/A:1010407728614. S2CID 34783510.
^ Eysenck, M. (2000). Psychology: A student's handbook. Psychology Press LTD.
^ Raosal, C.; Eklund, J.; Hansen, E.M. (2011). "Toward a conceptualization of ethnocultural empathy". Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology. 5 (1): 1–thirteen. doi:10.1037/h0099278.
^ ^a ^b DeTurk, Southward. (2001). "Intercultural empathy: Myth, competency, or possibility for brotherhood building?". Communication Edifice. fifty (four): 374–384. doi:10.1080/03634520109379262. S2CID 144949477.
^ Sue, D.West.; Sue, D. (1977). "Barriers to effective cantankerous-cultural counseling". Journal of Counseling Psychology. 24 (5): 420–429. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.24.five.420.
^ Kempen, H., Paul Voestermans & Five.J. Welten. De Nijmeegse cultuurpsychologie. Psychologisch Laboratorium, Universiteit Nijmegen, 1991.